Keynote B-21: Pembrolizumab vs. Placebo in High-risk Endometrial Cancer
Keynote B-21
Trial in Clinical Context - Watch the Video
Study Summaries (Combined)
Hypothesis:
Pembrolizumab combined with adjuvant chemotherapy (with or without radiotherapy) improves disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to chemotherapy and placebo in patients with newly diagnosed, high-risk endometrial cancer.
Inclusion Criteria:
- HIGH-RISK DISEASE with Post-surgery, no macroscopic residual disease
- FIGO stage I/II of non-endometrioid histology
- Endometrioid histology with p53/TP53 abnormality
- Stage III/IVA of any histology
- ECOG 0 or 1.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Recurrent endometrial cancer or other specific tumor types like mesenchymal or neuroendocrine tumors.
- Known POLE mutation.
- Active autoimmune disease or systemic immunosuppression.
Primary End Point:
Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in the intention-to-treat population.
Experimental Arm(s):
- Pembrolizumab (200 mg every 3 weeks for 6 cycles) + Carboplatin (AUC 5 or 6 mg/mL/min) + Paclitaxel (175 mg/m² every 3 weeks for 6 cycles)
- Option for external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) or brachytherapy following chemotherapy.
- Pembrolizumab maintenance: 400 mg every 6 weeks for 6 cycles.
Control Arm (Standard Therapy):
- Placebo + Carboplatin (AUC 5 or 6 mg/mL/min) + Paclitaxel (175 mg/m² every 3 weeks for 6 cycles).
- Optional radiotherapy as per the experimental arm.
- Placebo maintenance every 6 weeks for 6 cycles.
Results:
Radiation Therapy Proportions:
Experimental Arm (Pembrolizumab + Chemotherapy):
- External Beam Radiation Therapy (EBRT) with Cisplatin: 17.0%
- EBRT without Cisplatin: 57.4%
- Brachytherapy Only: 6.4%
- No Radiation Therapy (Neither EBRT nor Brachytherapy): 19.1%
Control Arm (Placebo + Chemotherapy):
- External Beam Radiation Therapy (EBRT) with Cisplatin: 18.6%
- EBRT without Cisplatin: 46.4%
- Brachytherapy Only: 6.4%
- No Radiation Therapy (Neither EBRT nor Brachytherapy): 28.6%
Full Analysis
Outcome | Pembrolizumab + Chemo (%) | Placebo + Chemo (%) | Hazard Ratio | p-value |
---|---|---|---|---|
Disease-Free Survival | 75% (2-year DFS rate) | 76% | 1.02 (95% CI: 0.79-1.32) | p = 0.570 |
dMMR Subgroup DFS | Not reached | Not reached | 0.31 (95% CI: 0.14-0.69) | p < 0.05 |
pMMR Subgroup DFS | Not reached | Not reached | 1.20 (95% CI: 0.91-1.57) | N/A |
Grade ≥3 AEs | 71% | 63% | N/A | N/A |
- No significant improvement in DFS for the all-comer population.
- Pembrolizumab showed significant benefit in the dMMR subgroup but not in the pMMR subgroup.
Subset Analysis (dMMR)
Outcome | Pembrolizumab + Chemo (%) | Placebo + Chemo (%) | Hazard Ratio | p-value |
---|---|---|---|---|
Disease-Free Survival (DFS) | 92.4% (2-year DFS rate) | 80.2% | 0.31 (95% CI: 0.14-0.69) | p < 0.001 |
Recurrence Events | 3 recurrences (1 locoregional, 2 distant) | 23 recurrences (12 locoregional, 11 distant) | N/A | N/A |
Deaths Due to Disease | 5 deaths | 2 deaths | N/A | N/A |
Grade ≥3 Adverse Events | 78.6% | 66.4% | N/A | N/A |
- DFS events occurred in 8 patients (5.7%) in the pembrolizumab group versus 25 patients (17.9%) in the placebo group.
- No new safety signals were observed in this subgroup analysis.
Conclusions:
Adjuvant pembrolizumab did not improve DFS in the overall high-risk endometrial cancer population, but it showed meaningful DFS improvement in patients with dMMR tumors.
Limitations:
- No mature overall survival data at the interim analysis.
- Differences in radiation therapy usage across regions.
- The study did not meet its primary DFS endpoint for the general population.
Follow @gyoedu Follow @uppals